Corporate Transparency Act Rollback: What Small Business Owners Need to Know

Understanding the Corporate Transparency Act
Under the CTA, most corporations, limited liability companies (LLCs), and similar entities were mandated to report personal information about their beneficial owners—those owning at least 25% of the company or exercising significant control. This information was to be submitted to FinCEN, with non-compliance potentially resulting in civil penalties of up to $591 per day and criminal penalties including fines up to $10,000 and imprisonment for up to two years.
The law’s primary objective was to deter the misuse of anonymous shell companies for illicit purposes, aligning the U.S. with global standards on corporate transparency.
The Rollback: Suspension of Enforcement
In March 2025, the U.S. Department of the Treasury announced a significant shift in the enforcement of the CTA. The department stated it would suspend penalties and fines associated with the beneficial ownership information reporting requirements for U.S. citizens and domestic reporting companies. Furthermore, the Treasury indicated plans to narrow the scope of the rule to focus solely on foreign reporting companies.
This decision was influenced by concerns over the regulatory burden the CTA imposed on small businesses, with estimates suggesting compliance could cost companies nearly $9 billion annually.
What This Means for Small Business Owners
Relief from Compliance Burdens
The suspension of the CTA’s enforcement provides immediate relief to small business owners who were facing complex and potentially costly compliance requirements. Many small businesses lack the resources to navigate intricate regulatory landscapes, and this rollback alleviates that pressure.
Ongoing Legal Uncertainty
Despite the suspension, the legal status of the CTA remains uncertain. Several court challenges have questioned the constitutionality of the act, leading to a nationwide injunction against its enforcement. However, the Department of Justice has appealed these decisions, and the matter may ultimately be resolved by the Supreme Court.
Potential Risks and Responsibilities
While domestic companies are currently exempt from reporting, the rollback may inadvertently create opportunities for illicit activities through anonymous entities. Law enforcement agencies have expressed concerns that the lack of transparency could hinder efforts to combat financial crimes.
Moreover, financial institutions may now bear a greater responsibility in verifying customer identities and monitoring transactions to prevent money laundering and fraud.
The rollback of the Corporate Transparency Act’s enforcement marks a significant shift in U.S. policy on corporate transparency. For small business owners, it removes immediate compliance obligations, reducing administrative burdens and potential costs. However, the broader implications for financial transparency and crime prevention remain a topic of debate, and businesses should stay informed about ongoing legal developments that may impact future reporting requirements.
The National Business Association has authored and curated resources on various topics and in multiple formats that will help you achieve your goals. Whether you are considering starting your first business or if you are a seasoned entrepreneur, there is something in this Resource section of the NBA website that will be helpful. We hope you find this article useful.
Providing relevant resources in an easy-to-navigate format is one of the many ways that the NBA accomplishes its mission of helping small businesses succeed. It fulfills our vision of being an indispensable resource for the self-employed, small business owners, and entrepreneurs. If you are interested in a deeper relationship with the NBA, sign up for our free email newsletter or learn about becoming a member by clicking on the “Join the NBA” link above.